The agency of an individual or group—the set of actions available to them—determines which protocols they can engage with. This, in turn, determines which protocol-mediated parts of the built environment they can interact with as mere consumers and which they can shape more fundamentally. This agency, of course, differs for everyone and even varies for a given party over the course of a day, depending on their spatial and temporal circumstances. But it is always subjective.
Protocols are touted as a liberating alternative to the walled technological gardens that govern our lives: an eluseive utopiza – centered around user freedoms instead of commercial interests
I think this is a fantasy...their purpose has always been to simplify coordination....they do not liberate us, but rather seek to control us completely.
protocols reduce the number of decisions that need to be made
protocols gain legitimacy from participation
protocols resist central management
On the internat, we are part of swarms: networks of people, bnots, and content, coordinated through algorithmic feedback loops. Swarms are harbingers of misinformation, heralds of mutal aid, and representatives of the public will....most importantly, they can act collectively without explicit protocols.
Sarah Friend is one of the most creative, engaged, and critical voices in the field of new digital art and its discourses. As an artist, technologist, and software developer, she works at the imbricated fringes of art, finance, and blockchain technology. We are proud to announce Friend's first solo exhibition at Nagel Draxler, Terraforming, which marks the beginning of our gallery's representation of this outstanding artist.