Palo Alto

06 Sep 2024 - 25 May 2025
Open in Logseq
    • book by Malcolm Harris
    • Stanford Stock Farm as the original quantified self (or horse)
    • Some good gossip about Muybridge, stuck in a footnote for some reason (fake decorum?). Didn't know he invented the movie projector (aka zoopraxiscope). He needs to be in list of Media Science Heroes
      • Heh, "Palo Alto's first IP lawsuit"
    • Jane Stanford (wife of Leland) was murdered!?!
    • Something of the stupid left in this books take. No real appreciation for the work of technology, too much on obscure leftists groups (Bob Avakian gets more mentions than Stewart Brand). OK the history of the Black Panthers and other lesser-known groups is kind of interesting? In theory.
    • Malcolm Harris on Palo Alto, Silicon Valley, and capitalism | Vox
      • So much of the history of Silicon Valley is about the design, and not the labor and the execution...When we think about early Apple, we think about Steve Wozniak wiring the Apple I, and then we don’t worry about who wires any of the other Apples they make. It’s just wiring. The first one is the important part. The fact that the rest of them are wired by immigrant workers in basements throughout the Bay Area isn’t particularly relevant to the Apple story as far as people are concerned.
      • The industry took this as its ethos. You have the construction of what they called fabless semiconductor production, which is: They figured out you can offshore all the actual wiring and the production, and you can just do the design here.
      • That’s the ethos still. If you look at the back of an Apple product, it says designed in California, produced in China. Those parts are produced in a number of different places, none of which are California. Being able to separate the intellectual work, what they understood as the design or the “real” hard part, from the bodily labor is key to what we call the Palo Alto system. It’s the Palo Alto kind of capitalism that we don’t even think about.
    • Something about the above makes me want to scream. It's right in some ways, and sure, the decoupling of design and fab is fundamental, and the radical separation of them is probably bad in some way. But I am not sure this is "Palo Alto system" or just the way digital technology inherently works.N
    • Note: gave up on this book halfway through when I decided author was a particularly tedious kind of leftist, and his review of the Stewart Brand biography was so bad as to put him on my permanent ignore-list.