Out of Revolution

21 Jun 2026 - 21 Jun 2026
Open in Logseq
    • book by Eugene Rosenstock-Huessy. Enthusiastically recommended by SB somewhere, which moved me to buy a copy which I have been lugging around (it's a fat paperback) for decades. Just took a look and it opens with a discussion of "national passions" which I reinterpret as agency.
    • Ask Claude
      • You're likely referring to Out of Revolution: Autobiography of Western Man (1938).
      • The "national passions" framework Rosenstock-Huessy uses there — where different nations embody different revolutionary impulses or spiritual energies that drive history — does map interestingly onto agency if you read "passion" not as mere emotion but as a characteristic mode of striving or directed will that defines a collective actor.
      • What's the specific reinterpretation you're making? Are you reading the national passions as different types of agency, or as evidence that agency is always culturally/historically embedded rather than individual?
      • Just summarize the argument of the book please Ask Claude
        • Out of Revolution argues that the major Western revolutions — Russian, French, English, German (Reformation), and the earlier Papal/Gregorian revolution — were not isolated national events but successive chapters in a single story: the creation of a unified European civilization.
        • Each revolution contributed something essential and irreversible to that civilization:
        • The Papal Revolution established the independence of spiritual authority from secular power
        • The German Reformation made individual conscience central
        • The English Revolution created parliamentary government and common law
        • The French Revolution produced the nation-state and civic equality
        • The Russian Revolution raised the question of economic justice
        • Each nation acted as a kind of carrier of a specific principle that then became the property of all Western civilization. The revolutions build on and respond to each other across centuries.
        • The overarching claim is that Western history has a coherent spiritual biography — hence "autobiography of Western man" — driven by successive attempts to answer the question of how humans should live together. No single nation owns the answer; civilization is the cumulative result.
        • Rosenstock-Huessy was writing in 1938, so there's also an urgent political subtext: understanding this shared inheritance as a counter to the nationalisms tearing Europe apart at that moment.